Greg Wilson's Ramblings

LiveCycle Data Services 2.6 Documentation Available

gregorywilson — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:57:10 +0000

Documentation for the recently released LiveCycle Data Services 2.6 is now available here. API documentation is available for Java classes (Javadoc-format) and ActionScript classes (ASDoc-format).

More information about the improvements in the documentation is available on the Flex Documentation Team Blog.

More information about LiveCycle DS 2.6 can be found on the Adobe.com LCDS home page.

Adobe MAX 2008 Session Grid Spreadsheet

gregorywilson — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:47:02 +0000

The Adobe MAX 2008 site has tons of great information about MAX including a cool session locater/browser but sometimes it’s nice to have everything on one page.

As the manager of the LiveCycle developer sessions, I have access to the internal session database for the entire MAX event. After asking permission from a few internal folks, I created these grids so you can sort, filter, search, etc.

NOTE: Sessions are subject to change so you should always go to http://max.adobe.com/na/sessions/browser for the “official list”. The data I used is from a snapshot taken on 7/11/2008.

Flex 3 Component Explorer - a must for Flex beginners

gregorywilson — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:28:53 +0000

If you are new to Flex or if you are just curious about the capabilities of Flex, the Flex 3 Component Explorer is a great place to learn by example. Click on a component in the list, see a working sample on the right with the code below it.

The explorer has been available for awhile but I have met several Flex developers that were unaware of its existence.

Other Flex resources:

My other Flex-related blog postings
ILOG Elixir Flex Component Explorer (advanced data visualization components)
Flex Cookbook - another great source of Flex examples
Flex.org - great resource for everything Flex
Flex Application Showcase
Adobe.com home page for Flex
Adobe Developer Connection home page for Flex
Students and Faculty - get Flex Builder FREE
Top 10 mistakes when building Flex Applications - InfoQ interview with James Ward

“AIR for Flash Developers” now at Lynda.com

gregorywilson — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:12:08 +0000

David Tucker announced today on his blog that his new Lynda.com series, AIR for Flash Developers is now available on Lynda.com’s online training library (and soon to be released on DVD). You can view several of the tutorials for free.

If you are a flash developer with ActionScript 3 experience, you should check this out. Building desktop applications in Flash opens up a whole new universe!

LiveCycle ES Update 1 Documentation now online

gregorywilson — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:29:10 +0000

The LiveCycle ES Update 1 (LiveCycle 8.2) documentation is now online at http://www.adobe.com/support/documentation/en/livecycle/

What’s New Document for LiveCycle ES Update 1 released

gregorywilson — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:01:26 +0000

The LiveCycle documentation team just released a document detailing what’s new in the 8.2 release - also known as “Update 1″.

You can download the 24 page PDF from here. Topics include Workbench ES, Foundation, Process Management, Forms, Output, Data Services, PDF Generator, PDF Generator 3D, connectors for ECM, Content Services, Rights Management, Digital Signatures, Reader Extensions, and Doc converter.

Other information about LiveCycle ES can be found in my earlier LiveCycle articles

Nikon D700, D300, D3, D2Xs, D80, D60, D40 - confused?

gregorywilson — Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:05:15 +0000

I’ve been too busy in my “day job” during the past couple of months to keep up with the Nikon rumor mill so when Nikon announced the D700, I was surprised AND a bit confused as to where this new camera fit into the D-series lineup.

I own a Nikon D70, D200 and D300. As expected, the the higher the model number, the more capable the camera. This makes sense! However, if you look at the entire collection of D-series model numbers, it gets very confusing. For example, the D40 is newer and more capable than the D50 or the D70. The recently announced D60 is even newer and more capable. Now, Nikon skips from the D300 to the D700? I feel like I need a decoder ring!

I decided to capture several of web pages for offline reading (using Adobe Acrobat 9 of course!) from dpreview.com, kenrockwell.com, and wikipedia and study them on my recent flight from London to home. I had some time to kill and was ready for a break from the job after a long week of meetings. After studying each of the 19 Nikon D-series cameras, I now understand the entire lineup much better than before. From looking at some of the popular photography message boards, I noticed that many others share my confusion so I felt that my research was blog worthy.

I created a simple grid showing every Nikon D-series camera sorted by release date of the camera. I’ve selected a handful of attributes to put in the columns of my grid. I don’t propose that these are the only attributes worth considering when evaluating a digital camera so don’t base any purchase decisions solely on my grid! The attributes selected are used to illustrate the high-level differences between each camera model.

* The D300 and D700 will do 8 FPS if used with the battery grip
** Higher ISO speeds are available via “boost” but quality suffers dramatically

Here are my conclusions on the basic numbering scheme of the Nikon D-series (feel free to correct me):

Dx = Pro-level camera. The priority is in features and ruggedness, not size and weight. Check out the frames per second (FPS) on the D3 compared to the Dxxx and Dxx models. It’s obvious that this camera is for hard-core photographers. Take a look at the photographers on the sidelines of an NFL game. You’ll see a lot of D3’s. These photographers need very fast frame rates, huge storage capacity and a camera that can survive an occasional 300lb collision! Nikon focuses on giving professional photographers what they want and spare no expense to deliver. Take a look at the price of the D3 and you’ll see what I mean! It ain’t cheap! I want one but I can’t justify the cost. I do just fine with my D300.
Dxx = Entry-level camera. Although these cameras are categorized as “entry-level”, they are extremely capable and solid cameras. Entry-level describes pricing more than capabilities. Many of these cameras are used by pros, sometimes as a backup camera. I know a professional photographer that carries a D70 as a backup to his D2Xs. He knows that if the D2Xs fails, he can keep doing his job and deliver good images using the D70.
Dxxx = High-end amateur and pro. These cameras fill the gap between the previous two categories. Their specs are very good and many pros find them more than adequate (including myself).

Below is a illustration from wikipedia that further breaks down the categories:

DX vs. FX

The Nikon D-series cameras followed a long line of 35mm film SLR cameras. The size of a 35mm film frame is about 36mm x 23.9mm. When the D-series was launched, Nikon and others wanted to use a similar size digital sensor because it would allow all of the lenses to have the same angle of view as they did with the 35mm SLRs. Unfortunately, a sensor this size was not practical at the time so Nikon went with the smaller 23.7mm x 15.7mm sensor (now known as the DX format). Photographers using lenses from the their 35mm cameras had to re-calibrate their brains when thinking about focal length to adjust for the difference! The DX sensor is smaller so the image projected by the lens is cropped. As a result, photographers using their existing lenses had to multiple focal lengths by 1.5 to estimate the new results. For example, with a 35mm film frame, a 200mm lens provides 4X magnification, but with the smaller DX sensor, the resulting image is equivalent to a 300mm lens (200×1.5) resulting in a zoom of 6X. Although this sounds like a nice bonus, it made wide angle lenses not so wide when used on a DX camera.

In 2003, Nikon introduced DX lenses. These lenses projected an image that matched the size of the DX format sensor. A list of Nikon DX lenses can be found here.

The Nikon D3 is the first Nikon digital SLR to use a sensor that is the same size as the original 35mm film frame. This new format is called “FX”. There are several advantages of a larger sensor, one of which is that the non-DX lenses work as expected. However, if you use a DX lens on the Nikon D3, it only projects the image on the middle 5.1 megapixels of the 12.2 megapixel sensor.

The new Nikon D700 is the first Dxxx series Nikon SLR to provide a FX format sensor. Now it starts to make sense! The Nikon D700 is basically a lower-end version of the Nikon D3 providing a more affordable alternative to the Nikon D3 for photographers that desire the FX format. The Nikon D300 is basically a DX format equivalent of the D700.

My assumption is that there will be more DX format DSLRs and will most likely be named the D400, D500, etc. I suspect that D700 was chosen as the FX model number to some room for future DX additions.

FYI - I’ll personally skip the D700. I’m still very happy with my D300 and my Nikon 18-200mm DX lens. I do own a few non-DX lenses, including one of my favorites, the Nikkor 50mm f1.4, but I don’t have a real need to switch to a FX format camera, especially considering the cost of the upgrade.

If you are a photographer looking to purchase your first Nikon DSLR, don’t let the whole DX vs FX debate frustrate or confuse you. You’ll be happy with either format. My recommendation is to go with one of the Dxx models and later get yourself a higher end Dxxx. I often recommend the D60 or D40 to friends as a first DSLR. If you are on a very tight budget, a used D50 or D70 is a fine choice. All of these take fantastic pictures. Most are sold as a kit that include a decent starter lens.

If you want to read more about DX vs FX, I’d suggest the following:

Bjørn Rørslett’s D300 review - dedicates a substantial page discussing DX vs FX
Ken Rockwell’s article
Thom Hogan’s article

By the way, although I am obviously a “Nikon guy”, there are equivalent cameras in the Canon lineup that are fantastic choices as well. I’d like to see a similar breakdown of the Canon DSLR models to the one I provide above. I did find a timeline of Canon DSLR articles on Wikipedia.

To learn more about any of the cameras mentioned above, visit one of these great sites:

Ken Rockwell’s site - reviews and discussions of just about every digital camera
DPReview.com - great reviews, all brands
Nikon’s site
Thom Hogan’s site

Other good comparisons:

NEW - Nikon D700 brochure (10.5MB PDF) - http://nikonusa.com/Assets/Digital-SLR/25444-Nikon-D700/PDF/25444_D700_brochure.pdf

NEW - dpreview.com has a great side-by-side comparison tool. Below are 3 sets of comparisons:

NEW - http://www.nikond700.com - tons of information about the new Nikon D700 including the following D300 vs. D700 size comparison:

Below are a few pics I’ve shot with multiple Nikon cameras (and one Fuji - sunset out plane window). To see high-res versions and the EXIF data to see which camera shot what, go to http://gregorywilson.smugmug.com. Dpreview.com also has sample images for all of the cameras mentioned above.

Adobe Reader 9 - Still free but MUCH more valuable

gregorywilson — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:56:36 +0000

Adobe Reader 9 is now available! You’ll want to grab this so you can take advantage of the very cool features that Acrobat 9 created PDFs contain (see my previous article) and to take advantage of the faster load time.

Steve Gottwals, Sr. Product Manager at Adobe details the new features here.

As I mentioned in my recent Acrobat article, I plan to post some PDFs soon to demonstrate the new possibilities of PDF. It will surely broaden your perspective on what PDFs can do.

On a related note, it is now possible to embed a PDF widget directly in your HTML page using a feature from Acrobat.com. This allows your users to view a PDF inline without having to wait on the PDF to download. Lori Defurio has a great example in her latest blog post.

The above image is NOT the embedded PDF because WordPress does not allow flash content on their hosted site… YET. Click the image to see the real thing on Lori’s blog.

Acrobat 9 is ready for you to download now - You’ll be amazed

gregorywilson — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:26:18 +0000

Acrobat 9 is now available for immediately download from http://www.adobe.com/tryacrobat. If you are rolling your eyes because you can’t get excited about a program that simply allows you to print to PDF, you are behind the times! Acrobat 9 does SO MUCH MORE.

The Acrobat team has put together a collection of video presentations/demos that show you what I’m talking about. Go to http://www.adobe.com/designcenter/video_workshop (alternative link here). There are 16 videos so you might feel a bit overwhelmed. If your time is limited, I personally recommend that you at least watch the following titles (you’ll have to click them from the link above):

Overview of PDF Portfolios
Document Collaboration using shared reviews
Using Adobe Presenter to augment PPT presentations
Protecting your PDFs using a password
Exporting PDF files to Office formats
Archiving email as PDF from Microsoft Outlook (you MUST watch this - surprisingly cool! - check out the teaser screenshot below - it’s a PDF portfolio and it’s searchable, etc.)

Co-navigating PDF documents using acrobat.com (the screen shot below is two people co-navigating a PDF):

Once Reader 9 is out, I will post some PDFs that take advantage of some of these features. I am especially eager to illustrate how professional photographers can utilize these features. I already have some ideas for my own photography business!

To learn more about Acrobat 9, go to http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat

Adobe Acrobat 9 eSeminar Thursday

gregorywilson — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:39:45 +0000

Lori Defurio, product manager and evangelist at Adobe, will be presenting a one hour online seminar on Acrobat 9 Thursday, June 26th at 9:00AM PT/12:00PM ET and again at 12:00PM PT/3:00PM ET. Click here to register.

The title of the seminar is “Redefine the Way You Communicate” - Lori will discuss how Acrobat and PDF help you be more productive in your day-to-day tasks. She will cover quite a range of topics including Acrobat’s built-in workflows for collecting feedback - either feedback in a fillable PDF form, or feedback on documents as part of a review.

Topics:

Web capture - reviewing, archiving, and sharing information, you can stay a lot more organized.
Customized PDF Portfolios - quickly add navigation, multimedia files, and even custom branding to all your combined documents. See my example below.
Adobe Presenter software - create recorded presentations you share as a PDF document.
Create interactive forms in a few simple steps, so you can quickly collect and track all your information.
New collaboration capabilities such as synchronized reviews, you can keep everyone on the same page.

This will be a great intro to the new Acrobat 9 features. To whet your appetite, here are a few links to get you going:

Below is a screenshot of a portfolio PDF I created using Acrobat 9 from a few high-res digital images. I customized the headers, layout, colors, etc. I can now share this PDF with anyone running Acrobat 9 or Reader 9. This is a great example of how Flash has been integrated into PDFs. This and other capabilities will be covered in Lori’s session. Check it out!

Great LiveCycle ES article at The Intelligent Enterprise

gregorywilson — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 02:10:25 +0000

One of my google alerts stumbled on a article published Friday by Bruce Silver of the Intelligent Enterprise Blog.

Opening line - “Did you know Adobe had a business process management suite (BPMS)? Most people don’t, even though with more than 5,000 customers they could be considered a major player.”

Read the rest of the article here.

LiveCycle Enterprise Suite Update 1 Announced

gregorywilson — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:50:59 +0000

Earlier today, Adobe announced LiveCycle ES Update 1. This update introduces content management, PDF 3D support, 64bit platform support and numerous tool enhancements. LCES Update 1 (also known as 8.2) is due to ship next month. I wrote an article summarizing the new features on the Adobe Developer Connection website at http://www.adobe.com/devnet/livecycle/articles/update1_whatsnew.html

My previous articles on LiveCycle ES can be found here

To AIR or not to AIR - Pizza Hut

gregorywilson — Wed, 28 May 2008 19:32:42 +0000

I read some posts over the weekend about PizzaHut’s new AIR application, “Pizza Hut Shortcut“. I quickly downloaded it, installed it and made myself hungry.

My first impression was good - it’s a neat looking app:

What I like about it:

Good concept - frequently needed, useful, practical, etc.
Good looking artwork, icon, etc.
Great use of branding - bringing brand to the desktop
If all pizza lovers install AIR, we’ve won!

Disappointments:

Other than some locally saved options and the ability to receive pushed ads, it doesn’t really take advantage of any AIR features such as local file access, local database, drag and drop, etc.
The actual ordering interface is just a tiny web browser - too tiny! - and lacking in any RIA features. It feels like a mobile phone browser! The Pizza Hut regular web-based ordering UI is actually much better than this AIR version. This is the opposite of what I expected! I was really hoping for a cool, graphical, drag-n-drop pizza-building interface! Talk about a Rich UI opportunity! Oh well… maybe in v2.0?
The application is set to automatically start at boot time and to “Alert me with new coupons and deals“. Although this does take advantage of some AIR features, it concerns me and could become a terrible trend that will give AIR apps a bad reputation. The last thing we need is a reputation of creating more advertising noise! I’m always interested in good pizza deals, but I don’t need them pushed at me! I’ll check for deals when I’m in a pizza mood!

So, this raises the big question - When should applications be written for AIR vs. left as a browser application?

Technical Considerations:

An application is a good candidate for AIR when any of the following are true:

Offline capabilities are required. This is the classic requirement that makes AIR ideal. AIR apps can detect network presence and react accordingly. AIR provides a SQL database and local file access allowing sophisticated data-related features to be implemented.
There is true value in leaving the application running in the background independently of the browser - such as notifying the user of status changes, alerts, etc. A good example of this is the FedEx Desktop - it provides real-time status updates for shipments. AIR even provides the ability to create taskbar/OS X Doc icons.
Local data provides significant performance gains, reduced server load or added privacy (allowing the user to add data that is not stored on the server). A great example of this is Matt Giger’s Earth Browser.
Desktop integration simplifies the application. The classic example is file drag-n-drop interfaces such as upload/download. There are many other good use cases for this feature such as allowing the user to select specific data/objects to drag to the desktop or another application.
Operating system integration is required. AIR provides OS integration that is just not possible with a browser application, such as creating file associations, tracking user presence (this can partially be done in a browser app), auto-launch, etc.
Multi-monitor support provides needed screen real-estate. Large dashboard-type interfaces can benefit from this. I’ve yet to see an AIR application utilize this.

(All of the doc links above are part of the Developing Adobe® AIR™ Applications with HTML and Ajax LiveDocs. Similar pages for Flex developers building AIR apps are available here.)

Non Technical Considerations:

There are also non-technical aspects to choosing AIR. Developers should ask themselves the following questions:

Will the AIR application truly be more useful than a browser version of the app? If not, why not leave it in the browser?
Will the desktop advantages be obvious to the user? It better be obvious or your app won’t stick around.
Am I making an AIR app primarily to put my logo on the user’s desktop without offering any real value over a web-based app? (If so, DON’T DO IT….PLEASE!)
Do I really need a desktop presence? Why?
Most important: Will the user agree that I need a desktop presence? This is critical. Users have a very different “policy” when it comes to installing software. It’s more “personal” than hitting a web page. There have to be clear advantages, otherwise your app becomes trash quickly.

There are plenty of great reasons to deploy AIR desktop applications. We’ve only just begun to see the true potential. The Pizza Hut app has some fun potential and could easily become a showcase AIR example. I hope v2.0 is already in the works!

Here come the real AIR apps! - FedEx Desktop

gregorywilson — Sat, 10 May 2008 17:39:08 +0000

As excited as I have been about Adobe AIR, I’ve been a bit frustrated at the lack of real-world, useful applications that take advantage of some of the amazing features that AIR provides. Recently, I’ve started seeing some great progress! Here is a great example:

FedEx just released FedEx Desktop, an AIR application for tracking packages. At first I was skeptical. I was afraid that it was just an AIR version of a web-based tracking app which just doesn’t impress me. However, after installing the app and playing with it, I found that it is a great use of AIR.

What does this application allow me to do that web-browser-based tracking does not?

Local data - The FedEx Desktop app provides a feature called “Nickname Shipments”, which allows a nickname to be assigned to each package such as “My anxiously awaited Nikon D300“. Also, tracking history is cached locally and searchable by tracking number, nickname, etc. There are also filters that can be applied to see delivery exceptions, completed deliveries, etc. (see image to the right). If you manage a lot of FedEx shipments, this is extremely useful stuff!
Drag and Drop / Desktop Integration - As shown in the screenshot above, shipments can be dragged from the main app to the desktop. This “placard” is automatically updated as the shipment progresses.
Notifications - the app can be left running in the background and will auto-notify you as the status changes.
Branding - the entire application is clearly branded FedEx from the color scheme to the desktop icon.

The app runs on Windows, Mac OS and even appears to work on the beta version of AIR for Linux! Without AIR, it would be a huge undertaking to deliver a desktop application with this level of features, especially to multiple platforms. Since AIR apps can auto-update, software distribution and updates are much easier to manage. Lastly, installation is a no-brainer with AIR - no complex multi-platform installers are needed.

For more information and to download the application, go to http://www.fedex.com/desktop

I’m eager to see more applications like this. I know of others in the works already. Stay tuned!

Students and Teachers - get Adobe Flex Builder Pro Free

gregorywilson — Wed, 07 May 2008 21:16:27 +0000

Several weeks ago, Adobe announced that it was giving away Flex Builder Pro to students, faculty and staff of eligible educational institutions. Recently, I’ve met a several students and teachers that were not aware of the program so I thought I would do a quick post.

So… here’s the deal. You can download Flex Builder 3 Pro today from http://www.adobe.com/go/flex_trial. The eval license is good for 60 days so you can start using it immediately.

Then, go to http://www.flexregistration.com/, complete the form and attach a scan of your student/faculty/staff ID. Within a few days, you will receive your permanent serial number.

Then, go to http://www.adobe.com/devnet/edu/ and start learning and building cool Flex applications. You can also use Flex Builder to create desktop applications for Windows, Mac and Linux (Linux in beta now) that run on Adobe AIR.

You’re getting a $699 product ($669 on Amazon) for FREE so this is definitely worth checking out.

Note: This is not just for students…it’s for teachers and staff too! Whether you are the comp sci professor or the campus night watchman, you can take advantage of this.

Interactive Demos of ILOG Elixir Flex Components

gregorywilson — Wed, 07 May 2008 06:01:25 +0000

If you need to add sophisticated data visualization to your Flex and AIR apps, check out ILOG Elixir. You can read about it here - but I recommend skipping the text and going straight to the interactive demos here (or simply click the thumbnails below). A trial version is available for download from here.

Here are a couple of demos that show off the functionality:

Why I switched to a Mac after 20 years of Windows PC

gregorywilson — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:53:04 +0000

I’ve been a Microsoft Windows fan since 1987 and have used Windows 286, Windows 386, Windows 3.0, Windows 3.1, Windows for Workgroups, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows 2003 and Windows Vista. As you can see, I have a long, loyal history with Windows. I pride myself on my deep understanding of Windows and have mastered tweaking everything from network settings (MTU, TCP-Window, etc.) to maximize high-speed broadband, to customizing cache settings to maximize I/O performance. I can fix nearly any Windows-related problem you can throw at me. This familiarity has given me great comfort over the years.

Windows 3.1 Screenshot

During the past 15 years, I’ve consistently made fun of anyone around me that uses a Mac and brushed them off as a “non-serious computer user”. I made exceptions in this humor for artists and writers but everyone else was fair game!

Macintosh System 7 Screenshot

Recently, I started noticing some of my friends defecting to the Mac, including friends that are extremely technical and very hard-core software developers. This opened my mind a bit and got me exploring. Meanwhile, I continued to get frustrated by little things in Windows and found myself asking the following questions version after version:

Why does it take so long for Windows to boot?
Why does the boot duration increase over time, even though I don’t install new software often and regularly defrag my hard drive (including MFT, swap file, folders, etc.)?
Why do most serious Windows users accept the fact that at least once a year (more often for some of us), it’s necessary to do a complete re-install of Windows to regain performance and stability? (I call this a Windows enema!)
Why does my machine work one day but have problems the next day with NO software changes. What happened!?
Why does it take so long to shutdown Windows? Like boot-up, this seems to get worse over time.
Why does standby not work consistently? I have tried it ever since it was introduced and have yet to get consistently good results. For some reason, the stability of Windows decreases quickly every time standby is used.
Why did 64-bit take so long!? It’s not even fully realized yet for most of us.

I could go on and on…. device driver crap, conflicts, corrupt registry, adware, random blue screens, blah blah blah.

Don’t get me wrong, there are good reasons for some of these challenges - Microsoft has worked hard to maintain backward compatibility and it’s a miracle IMO that things run as well as they do considering the long history and customer demands. We’re all screaming for 64-bit yet Microsoft needs to also support a few 16-bit leftovers! Also, when you buy a Dell or IBM or HP or whatever, you are not only getting Windows, you are getting device drivers written by multiple companies so the complexity increases exponentially. Because Apple is a bit more proprietary, they can focus more on stability with their finite mix of hardware devices. I’m typically very against anything proprietary when it comes to technology, but in this case, it does make some sense.

About 11 months ago, to my dismay, and against my advice, my wife bought a classic white MacBook. I told her that she was terminating our support agreement that had been in place for 20 years and that she was now on her own! For several days, I would walk by her and ask, “how’s your new iPod doing?”. With very few exceptions, she’s done just fine without me. She takes advantage of the Genius Bar at our local Apple store, and signed up for Apple’s $99 One-on-One training program. Basically, you pay $99 per year for weekly one-on-one training on practically any Mac-related topic. At first, I couldn’t figure out how Apple could provide this level of support for only $99/year. If a customer takes full advantage, they can get 52 sessions at about $2/session! I quickly realized how Apple was able to pull this off when she kept coming home with new Apple accessories, software, etc. Clever marketing huh? Weekly up-sell opportunity! They actually do a great job.

After several more months of investigating and interviewing friends, I took the plunge. I was comforted by the fact that underneath the slick Mac OS exterior was real Unix….including Perl, Vim, bash, X11, etc. I spent many years of my career neck deep in Unix so it did help to see some old familiar things. Oh, and by the way, don’t tell me about the various Windows Unix-like shells - it is not the same! I can’t do “real” unix stuff like named pipes and I can’t do things like, “runapp | grep -i error | tee error.log” or run programs in the background (&), etc.

The Transition:
A few years ago, Gartner published an article titled, “Understanding Hype Cycles”. It was written to describe the maturity and adoption cycles of new technology in general, but I’m going to use the same phases to describe my experience - I think it fits well.

Phase 1: Technology Trigger
For me, the trigger was the fact that several friends that I have huge respect for switched. I knew there must be something to it. Another trigger was that my Windows machine was starting to show performance degradation– it was almost time for my semi-annual Windows enema and I was tired of doing this! I needed 64-bit so I could use more memory so I was already facing a few minor software compatibility problems.

Phase 2: Peak of Inflated Expectations
I heard from numerous friends and co-workers that Macs never need rebooting, are always fast, never get a virus, never lockup, etc. I have to admit, I was getting a bit excited about the concept. I had only experienced this type of stability with Unix and Linux.

I got advice from several co-workers on which machine to get, what software to install, which accessories to add, etc. I then ordered my new machine, a fully loaded MacBook Pro with 4GB of memory, 200GB 7200RPM drive, Mac OS X Leopard, extra battery, etc.. When the machine arrived, I quickly pulled it out of the box, plugged it in, turned it on and stood in awe of the incredibly bright LED-lit screen, simple back-lit keyboard, fast boot time, etc. Things were good!

Phase 3: Trough of Disillusionment
After I got through playing with my new MacBook, I needed to get back to work. This is when the frustration kicked in and the honeymoon abruptly ended. It started when I configured Entourage (Office 2008’s equivalent to Outlook) and started catching up on some email. I immediately felt unable to type! The following keys were missing: PgUp, PgDn, Home, End, Ins, Backspace and more! These all have easy equivalents but I didn’t know what they were! I hit the maximize button (which was on the “wrong side” of the window border by the way) but it didn’t maximize the way I expected. Later I closed the window but I noticed that Entourage was still running. I didn’t know how to “right-click”. I didn’t know how to switch programs at first and when I finally stumbled on command-tab, it didn’t work the way I expected. I was lost! What the heck was Apple thinking when they designed this interface? It ain’t right!

I then installed Flex Builder 3, copied over my projects and was relieved to see that they worked as-is, but navigating the IDE was very clumsy for me since I didn’t know how to do some basic keyboard stuff. I didn’t even know how to take a screenshot. I didn’t know how to install new software (what is a .dmg file!?). I knew at this point that the transition was not going to be trivial.

Phase 4: Slope of Enlightenment
I took a step back and decided to approach this with a little more structure…hacking was only leading to frustration. I found Apple’s “Switch 101” page at http://www.apple.com/support/switch101, which offers some very good advice to get a PC guy started. I also picked up a copy of “Switching to the Mac: The Missing Manual Leopard Edition” by David Pogue. This is a MUST-HAVE book. I read it cover to cover and started feeling much more comfortable. Don’t try the switch without this book! I finally got my head around some of the important shortcuts…such as command-Q to quit a program, command-H to hide a program, command-tab to switch applications, command-~ to switch between windows of an application (very cool once you are used to it). I learned how to use the dock, how to quickly get to my applications, how to open a terminal window, how to use spotlight (VERY cool feature), how to boot from a USB device, etc

Phase 5: Plateau of Productivity
It’s been two weeks and I’m completely moved in. To my surprise, I’m finding that I’m more productive than before. The machine boots incredibly fast. Network connections occur almost instantly, including wireless connections. Sleep mode actually works so I rarely shutdown. The keyboard is incredibly responsive and well laid out. I think I’m at about 90% efficiency on it…. but I still find myself occasionally forgetting how to move the cursor to the end of a word or sentence, etc. I think I’ll be at 100% within another week.

Microsoft Office 2008 - I was using Office 2007 on my PC and had only recently adjusted to the dramatic difference from Office 2003. I was disappointed to find out that I was going to have to go through another major adjustment. I am able to use Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Entourage (Outlook’s replacement) but it takes a bit of hunting through dialogs to find things. This will take a bit to adjust to.

I’m very frustrated by the differences between Outlook 2007 and Entourage 2008. Each has features that the other product does not have. Do these development teams ever meet? The needed features are there…but…well…it’s just different. One huge disappointment is that Entourage will NOT import a PST file! How can this be!? I had to purchase a 3rd party converter to make this happen. I was starting to feel a bit alienated by my good ol’ friend Microsoft.

VMware Fusion- I spend a lot of time talking about and demonstrating Adobe LiveCycle ES, which does not run on MacOS (at least not as a supported environment). However, it runs very well on a VMware image. I have three VMware images that go with me everywhere. Image 1 is a stripped down Windows XP image that I use when I absolutely have to have IE. Unity mode lets me run Windows XP programs side-by-side with Mac OS programs. Image 2 is a Windows 2003 image with the full LiveCycle ES install. This is my demo server image. Image 3 is a Ubuntu Linux image that I’m using to test AIR apps. See my earlier post, “1 MacBook running 3 OS’s and 3 AIR Apps simultanously” for a good example of the power of VMware Fusion.

Adobe Creative Products - I’ve installed the entire Creative Suite 3 on my new MacBook. There was very little transition time required for these since they basically work the same. I have noticed that Lightroom is much faster on my new MacBook, even faster than my dual-CPU Dell workstation. Both versions are 32-bit so I suspect that available memory is part of the reason it runs faster. Photoshop is basically identical with one exception. Over the years, I’ve developed a habit of using the keyboard to open menus. For example, to open the highlights/shadow dialog box, I simply hit ALT-I for the image menu followed by “A” for adjustments menu followed by “W” for shadow/highlight… never touching the mouse. This doesn’t work on Mac OS. Menu items don’t have this type of selection shortcut. There are shortcut keys to many dialogs, but you can’t navigate menu structures this way.

What I like:

Awesome keyboard (now that I have figured it out!). The back-lit feature is great on night flights.
Multi-Touch is incredible and very addictive. Also, I’ve configured my touchpad to do a “right-click” when I hit it with two fingers (eliminates having to control-click)
LED screen is incredible - very “white” - perfect for photography work
Having 4GB of addressable memory is nice. Caching seems to do a great job utilizing it.
Networking is very fast, especially when establishing a new connection.
Boot time and shutdown time are very good
Sleep/Standby works with no apparent impact on stability
Battery life is great so far. The website claims 5 hours but, as expected, I got about 4, which I’m happy with. Ask me again in a year
The power cord is nice - comes with an extender. The connection to the MacBook is magnetic.
It’s easy to create a clone of your hard drive to a USB drive…and it’s bootable! This is great if your hard drive crashes 5 minutes before a presentation. You can simply switch to booting from your USB copy. I use Carbon Copy Cloner (free!) to do the cloning.
Spaces is awesome - gives me multiple desktops - easily switched by hotkeys. There are equivalent Windows utilities but not as solid as Spaces.
Exposé is very useful, especially when I’m dealing with 10+ open applications.
The graphics card (NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT) is fantastic - 512MB of memory - incredible 3D performance. But, this is a work machine… so I of course never play games on it… so who cares
Software install and uninstall is cleaner. Many programs are just a simple .app file.

What I don’t like:

I miss Outlook. What I really want is Outlook with a few of the Entourage features added. For example, in Entourage, when I view an email that I’ve replied to earlier, I can quickly jump to my reply by clicking a link. When viewing the reply, I can quickly jump back to the original. Entourage global address book lookups are much faster than with Outlook. One big frustration with Entourage is the inability to convert text to a hyperlink. I often send emails with links to articles, etc. but instead of writing out the URL, I keep the email clean by saying “click here” and then convert it to a hyperlink. Amazingly, you can’t do this in Entourage! Do the Entourage developers not use the web??? Also, Entourage does not let me edit server-side/Exchange mail rules. I rarely need to change these so it’s no big deal. I can do it from the webmail client using IE under my VMware image.
Safari - it’s a nice browser but not as fast as advertised in my opinion. Several websites are still incompatible. Firefox was the first piece of software I installed! I’m not thrilled with any browser choices but I’ll get by.
Time Machine is a great backup solution with a very cool interface but it lacks the controls that it needs. I would like to have it turn off automatically during work hours. I have to switch it on and off manually. I’m sure there are ways to hack this but it hasn’t been important enough for me to investigate.
Microsoft Excel 2008 is a bit sluggish when moving from cell to cell. All of the features seem in place and many of most complex spreadsheets (with pivot tables, charts, etc.) work as-is.

Software Replacements
As expected, many of my every day utilities don’t run on MacOS. I was able to find alternatives. Here is a short list:

CuteFTP - replaced with Transmit - very similar features - I’m satisfied
Miranda and Trillian (IM Clients) - replaced with Adium. I actually like Adium much better and highly recommend it. It supports Jabber, AIM, Yahoo, Google Talk, MSN, IRC and more
IE - mostly replaced with Firefox and Safari but for those few websites that insist on IE, I boot up my Window XP VMware image.
Microsoft OneNote - replaced with MacJournal - it’s not an exact replacement but it has everything I need
Windows Media Player - replaced by QuickTime for some formats. I installed VLC to handle the rest.
FeedDaemon - my favorite Windows RSS reader - replaced by NetNewsWire - very similar functionality but it’s missing the ability to download full content for offline viewing. It does stay in sync with FeedDaemon running on my PC and my mobile RSS reader (NewsGator Go).

Overall, I’m glad I made the switch. I do think it’s a better OS for most things. I could have easily stayed with Windows and got the latest greatest fastest 64 bit laptop and maybe found the stability and performance that I’ve wanted all of these years….or maybe not. I haven’t abandoned Windows. I still have a very nice Dell workstation running both Windows XP and Windows Vista 64. I’m now able to switch back and forth between my workstation and my new MacBook easily.

I’ll post another update in a few months when the newness wears off.

Windows Vista / Mac OS Leopard

5/8/2008 - Very good article in Business Week titled, “The Mac in the Gray Flannel Suite” - about the growing demand for Macs by Office workers.